<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doings &#187; designers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://do-boy.com/doings/category/designers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://do-boy.com/doings</link>
	<description>What a do-boy does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Drop That Shadow</title>
		<link>http://do-boy.com/doings/2010/02/02/dont-drop-that-shadow/</link>
		<comments>http://do-boy.com/doings/2010/02/02/dont-drop-that-shadow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://do-boy.com/doings/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a coder, I spend way more time worrying about how something works, or how someone might break it, than on how it looks. I leave it to the designers to fret about that sort of stuff, and just make sure it&#8217;s usable and won&#8217;t crash when fed crazy input. (What my high-school physics teacher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a coder, I spend way more time worrying about how something works, or how someone might break it, than on how it looks. I leave it to the designers to fret about that sort of stuff, and just make sure it&#8217;s usable and won&#8217;t crash when fed crazy input. (What my high-school physics teacher called &#8220;monkey-proofing.&#8221;)</p>
<p>A recent project is a classic case in point: tons of UI stuff going on, and the flow isn&#8217;t completely worked out, so I built a somewhat functional prototype. It&#8217;s nowhere near finished, but the parts we&#8217;re focused on right now are working. The designer had included some drop-shadows along the edges of these elements, but as they had nothing to do with how they work&#8211;they&#8217;re sliders that can be &#8220;tossed&#8221; and animate to a stop&#8211;I omitted said drop-shadows.</p>
<p>Guess what the designer&#8217;s very first comment was? &#8220;The drop-shadows are missing.&#8221; Even though we both knew they were completely extraneous to the actual issue of how the animation works, <em>he just couldn&#8217;t get past it</em>. It was like an air horn blasting over a gentle harpsichord melody off in the distance; in your ear, it&#8217;s all air horn.</p>
<p>Tonight, as I continued working on the prototype, I figured I&#8217;d spare him the visual agony and put the drop-shadows in. It took about five minutes.</p>
<p>So I figure I saved five minutes last night only to spend five minutes tonight, plus several minutes lost today discussing the damn thing. In overall time, I lose, but I lost even more: it also took time to get the designer to focus on what really matters about the UI, which remains a not insignificant issue. But for all I know, his brain is clouded even now by drop-shadow absences.</p>
<p>I guess the moral is, for the designer&#8217;s sake, and your own,  make even the prototype look as much like his design as you can. Evidently it&#8217;s a corner you just can&#8217;t cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://do-boy.com/doings/2010/02/02/dont-drop-that-shadow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

